Skip to main content

BOTBs - Panasonic Lumix GH4

I blame peer-pressure and a good deal for my upgrade to the GH4. My GH3 was perfectly fine when I bought the GH4 - I was happy with the photos it took, happy with the ergonomics of the camera, battery life, pretty much everything. The GH3 had traveled with me to many countries, and had shot thousands of frames at airshows in the South East of England. In fact, the GH3 still holds my personal record for most shots taken with a single camera, the 22,500 shutter actuations dwarfing all others.
Panasonic Lumix GH4
March 2016 to Now
14000+ shots

The GH4, much like the GH2 was to the GH1, was more of an evolution of the previous camera. The body was more of the same - that same ideal-button-placement, that same weather-sealed magnesium-alloy chunkiness - though, internally, Panasonic had introduced the new-fangled 4K video. And in order to do so, had altered the plumbing considerably.

This made the GH4 a perfect photographer's camera. It had a large buffer that wrote files to the card speedily, new sensor to handle the 4K video but which also had better noise performance, a faster burst speed, better metering, and a faster shutter (both mechanical and electronic).

Panasonic also gave us their new Depth from Defocus auto-focus system. This is where a database is held of all Panasonic lens out-of-focus characteristics so that the camera can better guess where an object is within the focus-range of the lens. It was hoped that this would make the GH4 a much better subject-tracking and auto-focussing camera, but results were mixed.
One thing I did notice was that the focusing capabilities of the camera were much improved over the already brilliant GH3, even more so in low-light.

Due to a change of circumstances, I never got to travel with the GH4 as much as I would have liked to. Similarly, I never took it to an airshow, so never really tested the ability of the camera to grab focus (either through AF-S or AFC) of fast-moving aircraft. Its a shame, because the battery in the GH4 lasts forever - I rarely have to change it despite an all-day shoot.

I consider the GH4 to be an incredible camera, one that can be picked up for a very good price now that the GH5 has been out for a while. I'd recommend it to anyone who is looking to move from a DSLR and still wants that form-factor in mirrorless, but doesn't want to spend a lot of money - they can be had for as little as £600 in the UK (June 2018). And that money buys a lot of camera.

KewLondon
HomeHome
ShorehamSaltdean
BrightonSaltdean
BrightonSaltdean


Back to Best of the bodies.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Examples from the PL50-200mm

After I waxed lyrically about it , readers may well have expected a review from me by now of my "recently"-purchased Panasonic Leica f/2.8-4 50-200mm telephoto lens, and I do indeed plan to write one in time. However, I don't seem to be able to find the time to get in front of the keyboard for an extended period. So rather than leave you with nothing, instead I'll provide you with some example shots which I hope provide you with some insight into just how well the lens performs. Some of the images are with the 1.4 teleconverter, which I'll note in the information. I'm heading to Duxford for Flying Legends in a week's time, so will be able to show some images other than nature. Hopefully I'll be able to provide you with a more comprehensive delve into the lens next time I update the site. In the meantime, feast your eyes on these... Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit 50-200mm f/2.8-4 ISO200, f/4.5, 1/1600 sec, 200mm ISO200, f/4, 1/250 sec

Lessons from RIAT 2018

Last weekend I got up stupidly early to travel half way across the country to attend an airshow. But what an airshow! The Royal International Air Tattoo 2018! A word of warning - this is going to be a looooong post. Grab yourself a cup of tea and settle down... I haven't been to an airshow, or at least shot aircraft flying since the Goodwood Revival in 2015, where they had a number of warbirds from the Second World War flying. My equipment back then was my trusty GH3 with the first-generation Lumix 100-300mm lens, and my GM5 with Lumix 14-140mm as backup. These performed well as a pair, allowing me to grab take off, landing, and formation shots with the surprisingly-capable GM5, and the longer, single aircraft detail shots with the GH3. At the time, AF-S was used on both cameras, as I didn't trust the reliability of the continuous auto-focus offered by either - bare in mind that at this point, Panasonic had yet to introduce their Depth from Defocus technology to assist wit

A dark night, and a brace of Voigtlanders

I fell in love with the Voigtlander f/0.95 17.5mm prime as soon as I mounted it on my GH4 a few years back. It properly sprang to life once I moved over to the Lumix G9 - the higher-resolution viewfinder made it much, much easier to check focus, and I feel that the sensor was able to benefit from the lens more than the GH4's was. Due to coronavirus in the UK, I've left the area where I live on very few occasions. I am lucky in that I have the South Downs to the north, and the English Channel to the south - and both are only a five minute walk away for me. Despite coronavirus, I've ensured that I've kept my Photo 52 challenge up to date. This forces me to get out with my camera so that I at least have one image, no matter how rubbish it is, to show for my week. As the nights have grown longer, the Voigtlander 17.5mm and its 42.5mm brother have both joined me on my evening walks, so I thought I'd show you a few shots I grabbed the other evening whilst traipsing