The Panasonic Lumix GH1 was a very powerful camera at the time; in fact, it was top of the range across both Panasonic and Olympus. So why then did I pick up the bottom-of-the-line, hamstrung Olympus E-PL1?
Because, despite the GH1 being smaller than any DSLR out there and lightweight in comparison, I didn't want to take it out to social events.
And that's where the E-PL1 came in. It was a backup to the GH1, definitely not a replacement in any way, shape or form.
The price did it for me though. I managed to buy a very cheap American body-only kit - after exchange rates, it only cost me ~£100. I never fell in love with the camera like I did with my Lumix bodies, as it was too limiting for someone used to having so many controls to hand. For instance, the lack of a dial meant that every change (including shutter-speed, aperture and exposure compensation) had to be done by first pressing a button for the item you wanted to change, then altering it with plus/minus buttons. This made for a very slow operation.
In addition, the autofocus wasn't as fast as the GH1 and got worse as light levels dropped. Despite having an f/1.7 wide-aperture lens attached, it would hunt and regularly miss the critical moment.
But it was the cheapest-of-the-cheap Micro Four Thirds camera of the time, and it did mount all of my Micro Four Thirds lenses. And it did serve the function of being a cheap camera I could take to weddings, the pub, or on hikes, and I didn't mind if it got a bit bashed.
I still own it, having tried and failed to sell it in 2015 - I'll probably end up giving it to my son when's he's a bit older as a first camera.
Back to Best of the Bodies.
Because, despite the GH1 being smaller than any DSLR out there and lightweight in comparison, I didn't want to take it out to social events.
Olympus E-PL1
May 2012 to July 2014
~3000 shots
May 2012 to July 2014
~3000 shots
And that's where the E-PL1 came in. It was a backup to the GH1, definitely not a replacement in any way, shape or form.
- 12 megapixel sensor, instead of the ~16 megapixel multi-aspect sensor in the Lumix.
- RAW files with little headroom.
- Poor low-light performance.
- Rangefinder form-factor, rather than faux-DSLR.
- No viewfinder.
- No control dials.
- Cheap construction.
The price did it for me though. I managed to buy a very cheap American body-only kit - after exchange rates, it only cost me ~£100. I never fell in love with the camera like I did with my Lumix bodies, as it was too limiting for someone used to having so many controls to hand. For instance, the lack of a dial meant that every change (including shutter-speed, aperture and exposure compensation) had to be done by first pressing a button for the item you wanted to change, then altering it with plus/minus buttons. This made for a very slow operation.
In addition, the autofocus wasn't as fast as the GH1 and got worse as light levels dropped. Despite having an f/1.7 wide-aperture lens attached, it would hunt and regularly miss the critical moment.
But it was the cheapest-of-the-cheap Micro Four Thirds camera of the time, and it did mount all of my Micro Four Thirds lenses. And it did serve the function of being a cheap camera I could take to weddings, the pub, or on hikes, and I didn't mind if it got a bit bashed.
I still own it, having tried and failed to sell it in 2015 - I'll probably end up giving it to my son when's he's a bit older as a first camera.
| Bovington | South Downs |
 |
 |
| London | Devil's Dyke |
 |
 |
| London | South Downs |
 |
 |
| Hove | Glynde |
 |
 |
| The Thames | South Downs |
 |
 |
Back to Best of the Bodies.
Comments
Post a Comment