Skip to main content

An End and a Start

And so 2018 has been and gone, meaning an end to my Photo 52 for the year. When I look back at it in it's entirety, I'm quite proud of the work I've accomplished.
Photography isn't my job: it is my hobby, and so it is primarily something which I do in spare time (what little I have). The purpose of the Photo 52 project is to ensure that I pick up my camera at least once a week - a difficulty considering a busy family life. This maintains my ability to tweak-settings, and keep my muscle memory and general composition up to speed.

More often than not, a photo for the week occur within the local vicinity. Only six out of the fifty-two weeks feature shots from places outside of the greater Brighton area, mainly trips to London (though also my first airshow in years).
I really value and appreciate the opportunities to travel for photography, not least because it gives me some fresh subjects to shoot but also because I more-often-than-not do so with a friend of mine who is also well into his photography. It was thanks to him that both portrait sessions I took part in last year occurred.


Some stats for Photo 52 2018 (ah, the joy of LR metadata!):
Camera usedShots taken
Panasonic Lumix GH412
Panasonic Lumix G939
Apple iPhone 71
  
Lens usedShots taken
Samyang f/3.5 7.5mm fisheye1
Voigtlander f/0.95 17.5mm19
Panasonic Leica DG Summilux f/1.4 25mm4
Panasonic Lumix G f/1.7 42.5mm12
Olympus 9-18mm1
Panasonic Lumix 12-32mm5
Panasonic Lumix 14-140mm Mk24
Panasonic Lumix 100-300mm4
Panasonic Leica 100-400mm1
Apple iPhone 71

Over 70% of the shots posted to the album were primes, with the majority of those coming from my erstwhile favourite the Voigtlander. And I only relied on my phone for one week! Not bad.

I did try to get more use out of my zooms though. The 14-140mm offers such a useful focal length, particularly if you're walking around a National Trust property and don't want to be swapping lenses all the time. And it is sharp, much sharper than any 10x zoom of this type should be.

I even managed to grab some shots using my ancient 100-300mm telephoto, possibly the softest native lens I now own. It is quite soft unless stopped-down, has a sticky-focus ring, and also tends to zoom itself when the lens is pointing down... But there's nothing else in my arsenal that offers the focal-length (the 100-400mm was a rental for the weekend).

I was also surprised at how often I reached for the tiny-yet-capable 12-32mm pancake zoom. This lens is minuscule - you can chuck it in the camera bag without any regard for room or weight - plus it performs so well. I've started using it in place of my UWA zoom, the Olympus 9-18mm, which isn't quite performing as well as I remember it having done in the past.

What did I learn from 2018's Photo 52? Three important things:
  1. My Voigtlander isn't sharp across the frame
    I need to do some testing to ascertain exactly what is happening, but sharpness on the left-hand side of the frame drops dramatically from f/2 to f/4. This may depend on aperture and distance, as it is more noticeable in some images than others.
  2. The minimum shutter-speed setting on the G9 is both a blessing and a curse
    How many times have I gone to take photo, only to wonder why the shutter-speed is completely inappropriate for the focal length I'm using? I need to learn to check this setting when swapping lenses!
  3. Zooms are fun and usable
    And provide a lot of versatility in good light. Heck, with my newer zooms, I can even rely on the DualIS2 to shoot in bad light! I'll definitely be using them more in 2019.

What is the plan for 2019 then? Well, more of the same really.
I want to do another airshow, possibly Flying Legends. And I already have a light-show planned up in London towards the end of January. I'm hoping for some more portraiture, as that was completely new for me last year and I hope to use some of my learnings and extra confidence from the shoots to improve.

So happy new year! And let's get on with a new Photo 52 (yes, I've already started)!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BOTBs - Panasonic Lumix GH3

Panasonic had realised with the GH1 and GH2 just how much demand there was for high-quality, low-cost mirrorless cameras capable of brilliant video capture. And it was with the 2013-released GH3 that they responded to many of the demands that users had asked for. Panasonic Lumix GH3 January 2014 to December 2016 22500 shots Gone was the multi aspect Panasonic sensor, replaced with a 16 megapixel unit from Sony - the same, it transpires, as used in Olympus's at-the-time recently released OM-D E-M5 . This was a more capable sensor than the one used in the previous model, which helped with better noise handling at higher ISOs and higher-bit-rate video. Gone too was the compact body. Now, the GH3 was a chunkier magnesium alloy affair, and now weather-sealed. It was a huge improvement ergonomically over the GH2 - after shooting airshows for many hours with the GH2, my hand ached, mainly because there wasn't enough room around the handgrip for all fingers. This was no longer th...

A dark night, and a brace of Voigtlanders

I fell in love with the Voigtlander f/0.95 17.5mm prime as soon as I mounted it on my GH4 a few years back. It properly sprang to life once I moved over to the Lumix G9 - the higher-resolution viewfinder made it much, much easier to check focus, and I feel that the sensor was able to benefit from the lens more than the GH4's was. Due to coronavirus in the UK, I've left the area where I live on very few occasions. I am lucky in that I have the South Downs to the north, and the English Channel to the south - and both are only a five minute walk away for me. Despite coronavirus, I've ensured that I've kept my Photo 52 challenge up to date. This forces me to get out with my camera so that I at least have one image, no matter how rubbish it is, to show for my week. As the nights have grown longer, the Voigtlander 17.5mm and its 42.5mm brother have both joined me on my evening walks, so I thought I'd show you a few shots I grabbed the other evening whilst traipsing ...

Shooting the Clematis

In a prior post, I mentioned trying to find the perfect lens for flower photography . And how I was going to do some tests with the lenses mentioned within said post. Well, this isn't that test. It's another test. A test with very similar focal-length lenses, and with similar apertures. This is the Battle of the 50mm or Thereabouts Lenses for Photographing Clematis ! What are the contenders in today's test? Well, we have a trio of legacy 50mm lenses from a variety of mounts. And also an auto-focus lens specifically designed for Micro Four Thirds. Jupiter-8 f/2 50mm - m39-mount Helios-44 f/1.8 50mm - m42-mount Voigtlander Color-Ultron f/1.8 50mm - Q-mount Lumix f/1.7 42.5mm - Micro Four Thirds mount All lenses were shot wide-open, and all from the "same" distance from the flower. This distance was calculated based on the closest focusing distance of the lenses with the longest closest focusing distance, the Jupiter-8. Jupiter-8 f/2 50mm Helios-44...