Skip to main content

Photo 52 2018 - a quarter of the way through

I know things have been quiet from me on the blog front lately - this is due to being exceedingly busy at work, as well as illness at home. But I have at least been keeping my Photo 52 project for 2018 up to date.

Now we're a quarter of the way through the year, I thought it'd be a good idea to cast my eye over the shots so far - and please bear in mind that I do take more photos than those that are selected for the 52 project.

As I predicted earlier on in the year, the photos are all from the local area, with half of them coming from a small area of seafront barely five minutes from my house. This speaks more about my ability to get out and about and taking photos than anything else! But I also think it shows that a variety of images can be gathered from quite a limited location. In the six images I have a dramatic storm, a sunrise and sunset, geometry, street and long-exposure light streams.

How do a select images for my Photo 52? Well, I tend to pick ones that are different enough from those already in the album for starters. For instance, I managed to get some great light streams last week, but since I already have a light stream from a couple of weeks ago, I decided on adding a night-time shot of Brighton instead.
I've even got a couple of reasonable stilllifes in there - which I usually resort to when I've run out of days to shoot and am rummaging around for something to upload! The first one is from the camera club "liquid" competition, while the latter was set up to shoot my latest camera purchase - a Lumix G9. I hope to pen a future post around the new camera.

I've got a couple of planned excursions out in May and June, so you should hopefully see a bit more variety in the Photo 52 as the year progresses!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BOTBs - Panasonic Lumix GH3

Panasonic had realised with the GH1 and GH2 just how much demand there was for high-quality, low-cost mirrorless cameras capable of brilliant video capture. And it was with the 2013-released GH3 that they responded to many of the demands that users had asked for. Panasonic Lumix GH3 January 2014 to December 2016 22500 shots Gone was the multi aspect Panasonic sensor, replaced with a 16 megapixel unit from Sony - the same, it transpires, as used in Olympus's at-the-time recently released OM-D E-M5 . This was a more capable sensor than the one used in the previous model, which helped with better noise handling at higher ISOs and higher-bit-rate video. Gone too was the compact body. Now, the GH3 was a chunkier magnesium alloy affair, and now weather-sealed. It was a huge improvement ergonomically over the GH2 - after shooting airshows for many hours with the GH2, my hand ached, mainly because there wasn't enough room around the handgrip for all fingers. This was no longer th...

Lessons from RIAT 2018

Last weekend I got up stupidly early to travel half way across the country to attend an airshow. But what an airshow! The Royal International Air Tattoo 2018! A word of warning - this is going to be a looooong post. Grab yourself a cup of tea and settle down... I haven't been to an airshow, or at least shot aircraft flying since the Goodwood Revival in 2015, where they had a number of warbirds from the Second World War flying. My equipment back then was my trusty GH3 with the first-generation Lumix 100-300mm lens, and my GM5 with Lumix 14-140mm as backup. These performed well as a pair, allowing me to grab take off, landing, and formation shots with the surprisingly-capable GM5, and the longer, single aircraft detail shots with the GH3. At the time, AF-S was used on both cameras, as I didn't trust the reliability of the continuous auto-focus offered by either - bare in mind that at this point, Panasonic had yet to introduce their Depth from Defocus technology to assist wit...

Panasonic Lumix G9 - review

I have been a Lumix GH-series man for many years, starting with the original GH1. And yet I've rarely used them for video. So historically, why did I pick the GH cameras over the regular G or GX series? Because they tended to have more horsepower under the bonnet to process the high-definition (and later 4K) video files, larger buffers, and usually the latest sensors - and this made them very snappy cameras for photography. When Panasonic announced a top-of-the-range photography-centric camera based around the GH5, my interest was piqued - looking at the specs and comments coming out, this seemed like the ideal camera for me. And so a couple of months back, I received my annual bonus at work, and mere hours later I was the proud owner of a brand new Lumix G9 (the advantage/disadvantage of having Park Cameras half an hour drive away). First things first - it is larger than the GH4. And I don't mean slightly larger, I mean substantially larger. The GH4 look and size were...