Skip to main content

The Bluebell Conundrum

A couple of years ago, I was on the hunt for bluebells to photograph. Native bluebells, not the invasive Spanish species which are threatening British woodland.
Although the Olympus f/1.8 45mm was very good for getting a nice blurred background, the close-focus distance of the lens was a disappointment. In addition, shooting wide-open usually meant focusing issues: either mis-focus or not enough of the subject in focus.
Picture info: Lumix GH4, Olympus f/1.8 45mm, ISO200, f/1.8, 1/1600 sec

I soon found that the Lumix 14-140mm Mk2 at 140mm was very good for these types of shot. A minimum aperture of f/5.6 means that you're getting a large chunk of the plant in-focus, and the extra focal-length usually produces a relatively pleasing bokeh despite the slow-aperture and zoom.
Picture info: Lumix GH4, Lumix G VARIO 14-140mm @ 130mm, ISO800, f/5.6, 1/200 sec

The travel-zoom has effective in-lens stabilisation, yet despite this it can still be tricky to get sharp hand-held shots in the middle of a sparsely lit wood. The answer of course is a tripod, but most of the time I'm spotting bluebells whilst on a pleasant walk with my partner so not ideal!

Then, during one of my adapted-lens-frenzies, I looked into a lens of legend - known for its buttery bokeh, the Pentacon 135mm. I've yet to shoot any bluebells with it, and being a fully manual lens manufactured in what-was-at-the-time East Germany, has no modern things like stabilisation, but in good light it can produce lovely results. This is due to its fast-aperture of f/2.8 and the fifteen aperture blades (on the first version at least).
Picture info: Lumix GH4, Pentacon f/2.8 135mm, ISO200, f/3.5, 1/1250 sec

But what is best for flower photography? I've three lenses which cover the 135-140mm range for Micro Four Thirds (the other is the Lumix G VARIO 100-300mm telephoto). Time for a shoot-out!

Edit: Britain is in the midst of a cold-snap, and it is just too damn cold to head outside and take photos at the moment. I'll get around to this when it warms up a bit, and link back here from a separate post.

Labels:
Location: England, UK

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BOTBs - Panasonic Lumix GH3

Panasonic had realised with the GH1 and GH2 just how much demand there was for high-quality, low-cost mirrorless cameras capable of brilliant video capture. And it was with the 2013-released GH3 that they responded to many of the demands that users had asked for. Panasonic Lumix GH3 January 2014 to December 2016 22500 shots Gone was the multi aspect Panasonic sensor, replaced with a 16 megapixel unit from Sony - the same, it transpires, as used in Olympus's at-the-time recently released OM-D E-M5 . This was a more capable sensor than the one used in the previous model, which helped with better noise handling at higher ISOs and higher-bit-rate video. Gone too was the compact body. Now, the GH3 was a chunkier magnesium alloy affair, and now weather-sealed. It was a huge improvement ergonomically over the GH2 - after shooting airshows for many hours with the GH2, my hand ached, mainly because there wasn't enough room around the handgrip for all fingers. This was no longer th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lessons from RIAT 2018

Last weekend I got up stupidly early to travel half way across the country to attend an airshow. But what an airshow! The Royal International Air Tattoo 2018! A word of warning - this is going to be a looooong post. Grab yourself a cup of tea and settle down... I haven't been to an airshow, or at least shot aircraft flying since the Goodwood Revival in 2015, where they had a number of warbirds from the Second World War flying. My equipment back then was my trusty GH3 with the first-generation Lumix 100-300mm lens, and my GM5 with Lumix 14-140mm as backup. These performed well as a pair, allowing me to grab take off, landing, and formation shots with the surprisingly-capable GM5, and the longer, single aircraft detail shots with the GH3. At the time, AF-S was used on both cameras, as I didn't trust the reliability of the continuous auto-focus offered by either - bare in mind that at this point, Panasonic had yet to introduce their Depth from Defocus technology to assist wit...
2 comments
Read more

Shooting the Clematis

In a prior post, I mentioned trying to find the perfect lens for flower photography . And how I was going to do some tests with the lenses mentioned within said post. Well, this isn't that test. It's another test. A test with very similar focal-length lenses, and with similar apertures. This is the Battle of the 50mm or Thereabouts Lenses for Photographing Clematis ! What are the contenders in today's test? Well, we have a trio of legacy 50mm lenses from a variety of mounts. And also an auto-focus lens specifically designed for Micro Four Thirds. Jupiter-8 f/2 50mm - m39-mount Helios-44 f/1.8 50mm - m42-mount Voigtlander Color-Ultron f/1.8 50mm - Q-mount Lumix f/1.7 42.5mm - Micro Four Thirds mount All lenses were shot wide-open, and all from the "same" distance from the flower. This distance was calculated based on the closest focusing distance of the lenses with the longest closest focusing distance, the Jupiter-8. Jupiter-8 f/2 50mm Helios-44...
Post a Comment
Read more