Skip to main content

Setting yourself a challenge

Now that I'm unable to get out and about as often as I used to for my photography, I've found it increasingly important to actively set a challenge for myself. I love photography - the process, the equipment, the satisfaction of a photograph well taken - but without having something in place to make me pick up my camera, it would languish within the camera bag.
Picture info: Lumix GH4, Voigtlander f/0.95 17.5mm ISO1000, f/8, 1/2000 sec

I got around this last year by setting myself a Photo 52 challenge which, as you may have guessed, means taking a photo a week. I'd undertaken a Photo 365 in 2014 (results here), but thanks to my busy work and increasingly-busy home life, I just knew that I know longer had the time to dedicate to another one. It was tricky enough without a family!
Picture info: Lumix GH4, Voigtlander f/0.95 17.5mm ISO200, f/1.2, 1/8000 sec

Not only does a challenge make you get your camera out, it also makes you look for shots. And not just the every-day (though occasionally that's all you find you've got on the memory card). You start to take light a bit more seriously, grabbing the moment before it is gone as you realise that it probably won't happen again that week, nor indeed again.
Picture info: Lumix GH4, Voigtlander f/0.95 17.5mm ISO200, f/5.6, 1/200 sec

Since finishing my Photo 52 of 2017, I've moved offices with work. No longer am I bang center in the middle of Brighton - now, I'm in the suburban dreariness of Hove. This has given me added impetus for another Photo 52, and so 2018 starts with a new batch of photos. Now that I don't have Brighton's characters, architecture or life to play with, before work or at lunch, my shots now have to come from somewhere else. And so the hunt begins anew...
Picture info: Lumix GH4, Lumix G Vario 12-32mm @ 12mm ISO200, f/7.1, 1/320 sec

(attached images are from my Photo 52 2017)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BOTBs - Panasonic Lumix GH3

Panasonic had realised with the GH1 and GH2 just how much demand there was for high-quality, low-cost mirrorless cameras capable of brilliant video capture. And it was with the 2013-released GH3 that they responded to many of the demands that users had asked for. Panasonic Lumix GH3 January 2014 to December 2016 22500 shots Gone was the multi aspect Panasonic sensor, replaced with a 16 megapixel unit from Sony - the same, it transpires, as used in Olympus's at-the-time recently released OM-D E-M5 . This was a more capable sensor than the one used in the previous model, which helped with better noise handling at higher ISOs and higher-bit-rate video. Gone too was the compact body. Now, the GH3 was a chunkier magnesium alloy affair, and now weather-sealed. It was a huge improvement ergonomically over the GH2 - after shooting airshows for many hours with the GH2, my hand ached, mainly because there wasn't enough room around the handgrip for all fingers. This was no longer th...

Lessons from RIAT 2018

Last weekend I got up stupidly early to travel half way across the country to attend an airshow. But what an airshow! The Royal International Air Tattoo 2018! A word of warning - this is going to be a looooong post. Grab yourself a cup of tea and settle down... I haven't been to an airshow, or at least shot aircraft flying since the Goodwood Revival in 2015, where they had a number of warbirds from the Second World War flying. My equipment back then was my trusty GH3 with the first-generation Lumix 100-300mm lens, and my GM5 with Lumix 14-140mm as backup. These performed well as a pair, allowing me to grab take off, landing, and formation shots with the surprisingly-capable GM5, and the longer, single aircraft detail shots with the GH3. At the time, AF-S was used on both cameras, as I didn't trust the reliability of the continuous auto-focus offered by either - bare in mind that at this point, Panasonic had yet to introduce their Depth from Defocus technology to assist wit...

Panasonic Lumix G9 - review

I have been a Lumix GH-series man for many years, starting with the original GH1. And yet I've rarely used them for video. So historically, why did I pick the GH cameras over the regular G or GX series? Because they tended to have more horsepower under the bonnet to process the high-definition (and later 4K) video files, larger buffers, and usually the latest sensors - and this made them very snappy cameras for photography. When Panasonic announced a top-of-the-range photography-centric camera based around the GH5, my interest was piqued - looking at the specs and comments coming out, this seemed like the ideal camera for me. And so a couple of months back, I received my annual bonus at work, and mere hours later I was the proud owner of a brand new Lumix G9 (the advantage/disadvantage of having Park Cameras half an hour drive away). First things first - it is larger than the GH4. And I don't mean slightly larger, I mean substantially larger. The GH4 look and size were...